We can’t answer the question of whether or not a god exists, but we can answer the question of whether or not there is any evidence of one. That answer is a shout from the rooftops, NO!
Well, if I don't know the answer and I fill it in with God, and you don't know the answer so you fill it in with science, why is mine so anti-intellectual and yours isn't? Both of us have faith in our respective beliefs - I know atheists don't like to say that you have faith, but if you're gonna be honest with yourself, you do have faith that science will answer something it has not yet. That's faith.
I don’t fill the unanswered questions with science. I don’t fill them with anything. They are left unfilled.
I think you are misusing the word faith a bit. I believe the best way to understand reality is through evidence. That is not faith. That is the opposite of faith.
Faith is believing something about reality without evidence to support it.
I will say that I do have confidence in the scientific method. I think it is the best method we have for understanding the universe. I do recognize that humans do the science and humans are very limited creatures so in that sense, science is only as powerful as we are (or the technology we create).
I think I've heard you say before that you believe that science will come up with an answer to certain questions, "someday".
I'd call that faith. It has not happened yet. You do not know if it will happen. But you believe it will. Unless you've come back from the future in a time machine and they've discovered the answer to these questions (and, apparently, invisible pink unicorns!), then you are believing without proof beyond a doubt that it will.
1. Christianity is INHERENTLY DIVISIVE as believers are promised eternal bliss and nonbelievers eternal torture.
2. Christianity INDUCES UNWARRANTED GUILT AND FEAR by asserting that a Cosmic Judge watches one’s every move and knows one’s every thought.
3. Christianity OBSCURES TRUTH AND PROMOTES FALSEHOODS by diverting focus from the natural (real) to the supernatural (unreal).
4. Christianity DEBASES HUMANITY by condemning us as sinners worthy of eternal damnation.
5. Christianity BREEDS A FALSE SENSE OF IMPORTANCE by asserting that The King of the Universe knew each of us intimately before we were born, knows the numbers of hairs on our head, has a special plan for us, loves us, watches us, listens to our every word, desperately wants a personal relationship with us and even promises to give us anything we ask for (Mt 21.22).
6. Christianity’s assertion that the Devil is real ALLOWS FOR THE LITERAL DEMONIZING of others.
7. Christianity PROVIDES THE ULTIMATE JUSTIFICATION FOR EVILS of all kinds (such as the vilifying of homosexuals and the subjection of women).
8. Christianity’s THREAT OF HELL HARDENS HEARTS and causes others mental anguish.
9. Christianity PROVIDES COVER FOR ABUSES OF ALL KINDS as evidenced by thousands of sexual abuse cases in the last few years alone.
10. Christianity LEGITIMIZES FRAUD as evidenced by countless insincere televangelists and church leaders.
8 comments:
How did the universe come into being?
Wish I knew! But we are learning more all the time. Just saw this today...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1236882/Dark-matter-discovered-Scientists-believe-elusive-particle-makes-90-Universe.html
Maybe I'm highly immature, but am I the only one that giggled at the use of the acronym WIMP? :)
But even if the dark matter is the missing matter of the universe, how did that come into being?
Gotta giggle at that!
Again, we don’t know how the dark matter came into being. But that does not mean that we should fill that gap in our knowledge with “God”.
Merry Christmas Eve, Kelsie!
Well, if I don't know the answer and I fill it in with God, and you don't know the answer so you fill it in with science, why is mine so anti-intellectual and yours isn't? Both of us have faith in our respective beliefs - I know atheists don't like to say that you have faith, but if you're gonna be honest with yourself, you do have faith that science will answer something it has not yet. That's faith.
I don’t fill the unanswered questions with science. I don’t fill them with anything. They are left unfilled.
I think you are misusing the word faith a bit. I believe the best way to understand reality is through evidence. That is not faith. That is the opposite of faith.
Faith is believing something about reality without evidence to support it.
I will say that I do have confidence in the scientific method. I think it is the best method we have for understanding the universe. I do recognize that humans do the science and humans are very limited creatures so in that sense, science is only as powerful as we are (or the technology we create).
I think I've heard you say before that you believe that science will come up with an answer to certain questions, "someday".
I'd call that faith. It has not happened yet. You do not know if it will happen. But you believe it will. Unless you've come back from the future in a time machine and they've discovered the answer to these questions (and, apparently, invisible pink unicorns!), then you are believing without proof beyond a doubt that it will.
Post a Comment