Monday, November 19, 2007

is this perfection?

It’s widely accepted that God and Jesus are “perfect.” Let’s look at this idea.

SINS OF THE FATHER AND SON
The God of the Bible commanded, condoned and committed atrocity after atrocity. He drowned countless people and animals and burned countless others to death with fire and brimstone. He starved his own chosen people to the point of eating their infants, afterbirth and all. He punished them with diseases that made their eyes rot in their sockets and their tongues rot in their mouth. He opened the earth to swallow entire families, sent poisonous snakes to bite them, bears to tear them to pieces, enemies to slaughter and enslave them and commanded the genocide of entire nations. And if it’s understood that Jesus IS God, then it must be understood that Jesus did the same. Throw in the Holy Spirit who gives true believers the power to blind people (Acts 13:6-12) and you have three gods in one who all solve problems through violence.

If the three headed deity is “perfect” and solves problems with violence why shouldn’t we?

SLAVERY
God declared that his people were permitted to buy and sell men, women and children as slaves. In fact, God said a father could sell his own daughters into lifelong slavery. Jesus spoke often of masters and their slaves — of slaves being “heavily whipped”, “beaten,” “killed,” “stoned” and “cut into pieces” but not once does Jesus condemn slavery. Never does he suggest it’s immoral to sell your daughters. Paul instructs slaves to obey their masters in several passages (Ephesians 6:5, I Timothy 6:1, Titus 2:9-10) and Peter instructs slaves to obey and fear their master, even the cruel and unjust (1 Peter 2:18). Perhaps a single sentence condemning slavery would have changed the course of history.

If “perfection” never condemned slavery as evil why should we?

CRUELTY TO THE POWERLESS
Jesus is shown to be a cruel and bigoted character when he chooses to ignore a mother distraught over the suffering of her daughter. Apparently Jesus only came to heal certain people and this woman was born on the wrong side of the DNA tracks. No Jew, no service. When the mother desperately kneels and begs Jesus for help, he callously rejects her pleas and dehumanizes her by likening her and her little girl to “dogs” before finally easing the child’s suffering.

If “perfection” can speak so cruely to others why shouldn’t we?

In an act more appropriate of a demon than benevolent deity, a hungry and frustrated Jesus cursed an out of season fig tree to death simply because it had no fruit. Would it not be more “perfect” to “bless” with life rather than “curse” with death?

If “perfection” destroys life simply because it sometimes disappoints why shouldn’t we?

On another occasion he displays a total disregard for the welfare of animals—as well as the property of others—as he sends demons into a herd of two thousand pigs making them drown in the sea. Saint Augustine explained that this act was intended to teach us that we have no responsibilities for the welfare of animals. Pete Singer notes: “This interpretation was accepted by Thomas Aquinas, who stated that the only possible objection to cruelty to animals was that it might lead to cruelty to humans - according to Aquinas, there was nothing wrong in itself with making animals suffer. This became the official view of the Roman Catholic Church to such good — or bad — effect that as late as the middle of the nineteenth century Pope Pius IX refused permission for the founding of a Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in Rome, on the grounds that to grant permission would imply that human beings have duties to the lower creatures.”

If “perfection” destroyed innocent life and the property of others why shouldn’t we?

THE GREAT DEMONIZER
Long before Hitler became known as one of the most evil men of all time, a seed of hatred was planted in the mind of humanity. Planted by the writers of Christian scriptures, it declared that Jews were responsible for the murder of God. In those writings Jesus demonizes unbelieving Jews, calling them “evil,” “serpents,” and children of the “devil” damned to be burned in a furnace.

Following in the footsteps of Jesus, Paul demonized Elymas, calling him a “child of the devil,” and then blinded him (Acts 13:6-12). During the council of Nicaea—when Christianity was made the official religion of Rome—Jews were referred to as “mad”... “utterly depraved”...“murderers of our Lord.” Early fathers of the Christian church continued the dehumanizing and demonizing of Jews inspiring nearly 2,000 years of often violent persecution leading to Hitler’s “Final Solution.”

If “perfection” demonized others why shouldn’t we?

THE SLAUGHTER OF BILLIONS
Jesus spoke approvingly of his father drowning and burning great multitudes of humanity and promised similar destruction on the day he returned. Paul describes Jesus as coming from heaven “with His mighty angels in flaming fire, dealing out retribution.” If the Old Testament drips with blood, the New Testament Book of Revelation is swimming in it. D.H. Lawrence describes the writer’s lust for blood and destruction in the second half of Revelation as “flamboyant hate.”

Jesus’ revelations include images of people being pummeled by 100 pound hail stones, poisoned by bitter water, crushed by falling buildings, tortured for months on end by grotesque creatures, burned with fire, killed by war, famine, disease and wild animals. The “King of kings and Lord of lords” returns wearing a robe covered with blood. Blood is spilled in the streets and rains from the sky. There are rivers of blood, a sea of blood filled with dead creatures and a flood of blood pouring out of the wine press of his father’s furious anger. Jesus reveals that upon his second coming over a third of the world’s population will be killed meaning a slaughter of over two billion men, women and children if he returned today.

If “perfection” promises to cover the earth in blood why shouldn’t we?

ETERNAL VIOLENCE
Jesus said he came not to bring peace but a sword. He told many violent parables which included accounts of a vineyard owner slaying his tenants, a master slicing up his slave, a king commanding his enemies be executed in front of him, a stone symbolizing himself, upon which some people are broken to pieces and under which others are crushed to dust and threatened to personally throw Jezebel and her adulturous partners on a bed where he would make them “suffer terribly” and “kill her children.” Of course, no violence can compare to Jesus’ threat of punishing humans in the fires of hell for eternity.

Jesus promised that humans would be burned by flames that never go out and would be eaten by worms that never die. He spoke of disbelievers being condemned, of angels separating the wicked from the righteous, of crying and gnashing of teeth, of people suffering day and night for ever and always, of entire cities being thrown into a fiery furnace. Again and again, Jesus preached the most abhorent of all concepts—the doctrine of Hell.

The Sight of Hell (1855), inspired by Jesus, penned by a priest and distributed to children in Catholic churches has St. Basil and St. Teresa describing hell as a place where worms without number bite and eat the flesh causing unbearable pain. The question is asked: “How will you feel in hell, when millions of them make their dwelling-place in your mouth, and ears, and eyes, and creep all over you, and sting you with their deadly stings through all eternity?” On the sordid tour of the “fiery furnace” we are escorted into different torture chambers where children are burning alive and screaming to get out. One young woman is described as wearing a flaming dress and bonnet of fire that burns into her skull and melts her brain. Children are “chained down on beds of red-hot blazing fire” and their bodies are salted with fire. “The fire burns through every bone and every muscle. Every nerve is trembling and quivering with the sharp fire. The fire rages inside the skull, it shoots out through the eyes, it drops out through the ears, it roars in the throat as it roars up a chimney.” The booklet concludes…“There is one thing which could change hell into heaven. An angel of God comes to the gates of hell and says: ‘Listen to me, all ye people in hell, for I bring you good news. You will still burn in hell for almost countless millions of years. But a day will come, and on that day the pains of hell will be no more! You will go out of hell.’ But such a message will never come to hell, because God has said that the punishment of hell shall be everlasting!”

It is time we call these archaic methods of control exactly what they are—‘mental abuse.’ In the year 2004 alone, over 1,000 cases of sexual abuse were filed in the U.S. against priests accused of molesting and raping children and teenagers. Ethologist, Richard Dawkins said, “Who will say with confidence that sexual abuse is more permanently damaging to children then threatening them with the eternal and unquenchable fires of hell?” Psychologist Margaret Knight, said “This hideous doctrine of eternal torment after death has probably caused more terror and misery, more cruelty and more violation of natural human sympathy, than any belief in the history of mankind. Yet this doctrine was taught unambiguously by Jesus.”

If “perfection” inflicts never ending torture why shouldn’t we inflict all the torture we’re capable of?

LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES
In the gospel of Mark, the Jesus character said “whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours.” (Mk 11:24) We all know this simply is not true. In Matthew he said, “Ask and it will be given to you... For everyone who asks receives...” (Mt 7:7-8) And, “If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer.” (Mt 21:22) Again, both statements are clearly not true. In another gospel, Jesus promises, “Whatever you ask in my name, I will do it...” (John 14:13-14) Once again, not true. Jesus also notes that if one gets a friend to agree on a wish, God himself will make it real. “Again I say to you, if two of you agree on earth about anything they ask, it will be done for them...” (Matthew 18:19) Yet another demonstrable untruth. How many untrue statements must a person make before it is fair to call them a liar?

Not only is the Jesus character a blatant liar, his statements are irresponsible and dangerous. Imagine if all Christians really believed what he said about handling snakes and drinking poison? (Mark16:18) Sadly, thousands of people have and have suffered countless bites, deformities, and death due directly to Jesus’ lies. And it seems Jesus had no understanding of germs, disease or epilepsy thinking instead that “evil spirits” or “demons” were behind their ailments. (See Luke 13:15-16 for but one example) What if all Christians took their suffering children to the priest instead of the doctor? Or just asked God to make them well like Jesus suggested? Glass of poison anyone?

If “perfection” tells lies, why shouldn’t we?

If perfection solves problems with violence, speaks cruelly to others, destroys innocent life and the property of others, demonizes others, covers the earth in blood, tortures people, and tells lies, why shouldn’t we? Are we to be holier than our God? To suggest such a miserable projection of our worst human characteristics is a “perfect” God is to call evil, good.

3 comments:

Vincent said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Vincent said...

To give up religion is one thing. When will you give up preaching?

Greg Allen said...

I'm new here.
-G